Mortgage Rap

 

 

Never TILA lie, but tell the cost of credit,

APR and finance charge, so your clients get it.

Make sure you disclose, before you grow your nose, the following list and how it goes.

 

TIL statement and a guide

A charming booklet that adjusts just fine

A prepayment disclosure for them peeps

and notice of their right to rescind

HELIicopters(HELOCS) line up at your home

with a chance of ARM balloons if that’s your type of loan.

 

Reg Z gives some  time guidelines

For the TIL Statement the lender provides.

After the app arrives, we have 3 days,

At the latest 7 days before closing day.

 

What defines an app, for TI LA,

6 bits of info, think about it, duh

3 from the borrower, and 3 from the property

name, social, income for the first,

Next comes value, address, loan amount.

 

After they close, and everything is rosy

The client still has 3 days to rescind.

Every business day, and time runs away, every day counts, except sundays, holidays.

But failure to notify, or understated buy, gives the buyer 3 more years to decide.

 

Advertising sucks, with all these guidelines,

And the feds get along with Steve Lines

Number means trigger, so watch what you say, better tell the APR or bye to Fannie Mae.

Terms to fit your budget, 12% APR, both are acceptable things to say.

 

And so ends my rap, of TILA, it’s better than vanilla, and you’ll close your Deala.

 

 

Book Review: And Then The Roof Caved In

This book, written by David Faber, summarizes the collapse of the mortgage industry in 2007, and details the many factors that created this collapse.

He mentions the creation of an entity and an industry: Fannie Mae in 1938, and the subprime mortgage industry in 1993.

Of the many factors that colluded to cause this financial catastrophe were the following:

  • The inability of rating companies to gauge the risk of subprime mortgages.
  • Wall Street replacing Fannie and Freddie as regulators of the secondary mortgage industry.
  • Alan Greenspan lowering interest rates after 9/11/2011, thus reviving the dying subprime mortgage industry.
  • The creation of synthetic CDOs, mezzanine CDOs, and CDSs, with no contemplation of a decrease in home values.
  • Teaser rate underwriting, and no verification of income for homebuyers.

Definitions and Explanations:

All these are basically inventions designed to sell an untested, high risk product to clueless investors.

  • An MBS is a mortgage backed security, which is a compilation of mortgages sold to investors.
  • A CDO is a collateralized debt obligation, which is a compilation of MBSs.
  • A CDS is a credit default swap, which is insurance in the case of a defaulting CDO.
  • A synthetic CDO is a compilation of CDSs.
  • A mezzanine CDO is a way to turn high-risk mortgages into low-risk mortgages, based on subjective criteria.

My Take

David Faber provides a wonderful synopsis of this catastrophe, however, I disagree with him on the so-called “greedy” Wall Street. Wall Street is driven by profits, and so it was natural for them to take advantage of the situation.

Yes, I admit there may have been a certain level of greed involved, but another problem started in 1938, when the government created an entity to help the market. The government essentially created a new industry, and with their superb credit and government-backed reputation, Fannie and Freddie became leaders in this new industry.

Fannie and Freddie worked well until they were taken out of the picture in 2003, being replaced by Wall Street. When the government created a new market in 1938, they didn’t imagine Wall Street taking Fannie’s place in the distant future.

However, when Wall Street took Fannie’s place between 2003-2008, capitalism collided with a government-created market, and the result was chaos.

The government basically created demand for a product, financed it, and made a profit, but they were the only entity who could effectively manage the secondary mortgage industry. Without their reputation, financing, and non-profit driven ideals, they regulated the industry. Without them, the vacuum was filled by the free market.

Government agencies serve a purpose, but when they cease existing, the vacuum must be filled. When the entity filling that vacuum is un-government like, there is bound to be conflict.

As they say, you can’t fit a square peg in a round hole. If the round holes are capitalism, and the government is square, then my concern is the following: how long until the government stops trying to fit its square pegs, and starts creating its own square holes?